Linux vs windows reddit Linux/FreeBSD is easier in that the mystery is smaller. But amdgpu-pro also includes closed source drivers for opengl and vulkan, but again, that's just separate from amdgpu. Why not both use windows as a host and Linux in a VM. The post is a long and biased rant that may not reflect the opinions of the whole community. You sometimes encounter weird filesystem bugs on Windows and Mac which makes it annoying. I read some testing that showed Java Minecraft Server runs better in Windows. Windows is a bit annoying because of updates…Windows will restart on you and then I found myself needing to start Plex back up after a random OS update. When it comes to businesses, they used to be primarily windows since it was easier and cheaper (training costs money) and safer (business wise, free software doesn't always make sense, there's always somebody to yell "better have this fixed" at when you're Welcome to /r/Linux! This is a community for sharing news about Linux, interesting developments and press. I just graduated college with a CS degree; and I had always focused on learning about the Linux OS (internals, tools, cmd line, etc) I've met a lot of Windows Sys Admins since then though; where I had previously thought that most companies opt for using Linux-based infrastructure and tooling. If you're looking for tech support, /r/Linux4Noobs and /r/linuxquestions are friendly communities that can help you. EXT4) perform better than NTFS, and 2) the Windows GUI introduces overhead. But no, your assumptions are completely unfounded. When you get into Linux development you feel like working with a computer, with Windows there is a wall of buttons and menus between you and the computer. Hi, I've been debating on making the switch from Windows to Linux, but haven't been able to decide a few things. Bash is great. use tlp. Look at info on memory ballooning for more info. Windows 11 is very lightweight, fluid, and updates are quick and seamless. I can have a DL ready environment set up in moments on Linux, vs way too much time trying to use windows anaconda app or whatever. I don't develop software however I made simple enough programs using C, C++, and Rust for both windows and linux. It's a mature, stable OS. Following a bug with windows taskbar (3 months install, task bar would just freeze every 2 min, forcing me to restart explorer. Then you can connect to Linux from windows and Windows from Linux, and you get the best of all worlds. But you mentioned you want to run a server, most likely, a dedicated server for a game; then you must try if your game server supports Windows Server or Linux. The end result is much closer than people would think, Vulcan on both sides or even in DX vs Vulcan scenarios, if both are optimized correctly. I could spend more time tweaking the machine but I am always with my charger so it’s fine. Do you want to learn Linux so you can put it on your resume? Job wise, RHEL is your best bet. If you take the Windows and the Linux kernels on their own there is probably little difference, it's just that by default Windows has a lot more background processes stealing CPU time. , so those companies Disable any "Fast Boot" from the BIOS and also from Windows, and disable Hibernation from Windows --- you want Windows to always fully shut down upon rebooting, and your motherboard to boot slowly with all keyboard drivers enabled so that you have time to press the F2/Delete/Whatever key to get to the BIOS in case your bootloader breaks. I have containers native for example. Or check it out in the app stores   The old Windows vs Linux argument comments. You can disable a lot of shit in Windows (Windows Defender, background file-search indexing, etc), but even after weeks of trying I never managed to get it to a speed remotely resembling Linux on the same hardware. Also, unless you intentionally change the desktop environment, Linux DEs typically remain more consistent and constant over time than Windows. I use Windows, but when I'm working on a website I am using Ubuntu. Monitor temperature using hwinfo64 in windows. Both Vulkan games. Single-command full-system updates. I've mostly tested Nvidia GPUs. Similarly, most UNIXes (Linux, BSD, Solaris, AIX) are the same at the core, because they use the same tools and accomplish the same tasks. I picked the new Ubuntu 21. If you're required to use Adobe products to make a living, stick with Windows. I use Linux because I personally prefer Linux. 0, despite being, "almost stable" STILL has worse performance than 1. Windows was entirely de-bloated (no antivirus, no indexing, telemetry, Cortana and unnecessary background tasks disabled). Topics include software compatibility, customization, security, privacy, and more. Windows gets a few things better than Linux and macOS in my experience. In Linux Steam it used to be if a game was Windows the Install button would remain grayed out. So literally Linux uses a completely different driver than Windows with Radeon cards. Great list! I just did a fresh Ubuntu install on newly built PC instead of Windows (*which I haven't used in ages anyway, coming from a Mac) Originally thought Windows might still be the default way to go with a new PC but having used Ubuntu and Mint to salvage my old AMD machine over a decade ago, plus enjoying Linux for some of the reasons you listed, decided to try Ubuntu, and it's awesome. after a while, you understand how things work on each platform and you start to notice the patterns better, although as I said at the beginning the approaches of each system seem very different. I got an Alienware for my PhD laptop and immediately installed Ubuntu as a secondary OS. I only really miss Windows when I want to game, but that will be fixed soon. Mac and Windows are probably the most user friendly with these instabilities, but it's usually at the cost of having to deal with some things without having a fix (so much so that I guarantee you anyone who says Windows doesn't have any major bugs is forgetting bugs/quirks they've just learned to deal with). Here’s what happened: I flashed Fedora on a USB-Stick on my desktop computer, went to my laptop and realized, it wasn’t what I completely wanted. There are some performance issue as well. Same display software, largely the same libraries, etc. ml/c/linux and Kbin. I have used all three OS and the experience is better on Linux. Docker is best on Linux. , when they decide to override your browser preference and push Edge) and using the Windows version of their applications of choice, even for open software like web browers, IDEs, etc. It could be quality, but it's designed as clickbait. Edit: After todays (01 Oct) patch, Mirage on Linux sees better performance. But I never got the battery life in Ubuntu whatever tweak I have opted. NET/C# or something and also need Adobe products, which are hit-or-miss via Wine). Mac is also better than Windows but Linux even better than Mac. Or do you want to run Linux as a desktop and you want the most online forum resources and solutions? Ubuntu is probably your best bet. Also, Linux strictly uses OpenGL and Vulkan instead of DirectX. Well one can argue that has nothing to do with Linux vs Windows. I then decided to leave the Apple walled garden and bought a Windows PC with the excitement that I could try out Windows and maybe Linux too! The more I used Windows, the more I realised it wasn't for me, and I thought, no worries I'll put Linux on it. 4 (linux is better from ivy bridge to broawell). that's my point! windows offers us one choice! use only the versions strictly controlled by microsoft, you virtually have no control over your system's inner working and no matter whatever your uses are, everyone is given the same copy of OS. Updates with Linux can sometime break your system and make it impossible to use. If you want more linux commands/programmes on Windows natively rather than using WSL, you can explore using cygwin. One of my biggest hangups with WSL is the lack of serial port access . Performance kernels such as linux-zen and linux-tkg-* have been tried and tested and shown to improve system responsiveness, game frametimes, and usually framerates as well and there was never really any question about that. Long time Linux user here, who has recently bought a MacBook. I have a dual boot system running Windows 11 and Ubuntu jj. Proton, the compatibility layer for Windows games on Linux, has around a 5% performance hit. If its stable after a period, switch back to linux and run xmrig. Windows also has many common linux commands/programmes aliased to their Windows equivelants. Most people who say that Windows is a benefit of the Ally have absolutely no idea what they are talking about. PowerShell has alot more commands that correlate with Linux or commands that are aliases to other commands. If you take a Linux distro loaded with drivers you don't use and background stuff you don't use, you'll probably get a result more similar to Windows than to Windows hoarded a lot of performance just for itself and for things you wouldn't even use or need. To be clear, amdgpu is only the kernel driver (not opengl or vulkan) and admgpu-pro actually uses amdgpu. Eventually we might see Linux pull ahead but we aren't there. If you find that your computer is starting up slow, try disabling applications that are auto starting at boot. Recap: I dual-boot Linux Manjaro and Windows 10, and wished to see how each compared in terms of speed and efficiency. A lightweight system consumes less battery. Linux also needs better support community and more driver support. The "Linux kernel" isn't the same as "Ubuntu" or a "Linux distribution. Notably Minecraft and Runescape (including the OpenGL plugin on Runelite, and previously the OpenGL plugin in OSBuddy). This got worse and worse with newer Windows versions in which you needed a decent size of RAM just to run Windows itself. "Linux still has this WeIrD rEpUtAtIoN of requiring the command line to do a lot of things" decided to stop watching 6 seconds in, honestly if a person isn't willing and able to troubleshoot and learn and tinker relatively deeply within their system, then linux just isn't right for them Windows similarly lacks a standard package manager, but a lot of people (including corporates) use chocolatey. Almost nobody uses Windows exclusively on the Deck, most windows-on-deck users dual-boot to play unsupported games. Well For the tools you mentioned, Linux absolutely works. Here are the results. It spends the first minute talking about fluff before finally stating the topic: windows vs linux performance and instead of actually stating which is better right then as it should have in the video title anyway, he says "let's find out. For storing and managing files, either Windows Server and Linux can do it easily. The Linux driver is missing some things, most notably DirectX, and the Windows driver is missing some things, most notably Wayland support. Linux being lighter than Windows in most cases, it can get some gains here. With Linux, many software components are discrete and interchangable. Windows 10 runs very well. 125 votes, 128 comments. on Windows or MacOS. Likewise, I don't know if Windows supports it but you can have linux windows inside of the windows desktop like one big operating system. This is the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL, WSL2, WSLg) Subreddit where you can get help installing, running or using the Linux on Windows features in Windows 10. If you game use windows yes gaming is slowly coming Linux but it's no where close to windows support. When comparing Windows 10/11 with the Linux kernel, you again look at different scopes: The Linux kernel is just the core, missing essential parts to actually run the operating system. Most things come working out of the box (for example, setting up cpp on vs code on windows was a pain, whereas on Linux it worked right out of the box). While on Linux, we use containers and nginx as a proxy (adding an extra layer). both operating systems are entirely usable, but I'd personally prefer Linux. Add to that an additional CUrl command for downloading the file, and the dpkg install, that's 7. Don’t choose Kali Linux, it’s a terrible daily driver Choose a Debian or Fedora based distribution I’d recommend Ubuntu to start out I would hire a Linux dev over a Windows dev with the same experience without second thought Linux is cool, but comes with the sacrifice of software compatibility. I love PowerShell actually. All of this can vary as the code is updated too I tried Linux initially with docker and ran into issues. Bedrock is written in C++ which I believe the Linux kernel can handle better. Members Online I got sick and tired of that dual-boot bs. . Actually, that might be the only benefit. The phrase I’ve heard is “Linux has developers in mind. 04 up to date, 20-25 watts without tuning. Yes it's a little bloaty and the dir I am burned out from Windows support. Recently, I put Linux on a very old dual-core system with 2 gb of RAM. It's lucky if my co-worker's GPU-accelerated WSL environments survive a few days. Welcome to /r/Linux! This is a community for sharing news about Linux, interesting developments and press. And it's lower friction for trialing things out since it's the same OS as the server. I assumed that people are experts enough to do either windows or linux but simply preferred windows. Tbh you should learn both. Windows updates have bricked my wife's computers (BSODs). The market share is TINY compared to windows. Or check it out in the app stores   Amd is generally ~10% faster on Linux vs windows. The biggest benefit is running things that do not run on Linux. If you're a dedicated Windows gamer, Linux may disappoint. You can convert your Linux knowledge more easily to random other operating systems, than if you select windows. Didn’t want to get up, so I wanted to just work with the windows for flashing the usb again. 8) Only with some distributions. which have many of the same tools. If anything, Windows has the benefit of WSL that would allow you to build for both Windows and Linux without setting up CI. The switch to Linux (depending on distro) is not going to make a significant amount of difference from booting Windows. Considering a game locked to 30 fps, 400% difference means your windows version runs at 6 fps, while the linux version runs at full speed. To clarify once again, one can make software only for Windows and be a programmer without ever using Linux, at the same time the same person could learn Linux very fast, because coding is more difficult than just using the CLI etc. Unless there is a server app that can only run on Windows, go with Linux. Microsoft knows this (hence WSL, GitHub, Linux on Azure, etc), but since Windows is all about backwards compatibility their hands are tied and they can't do the necessary technical improvements to Windows at the OS level (e. TLDR from the article (which I largely agree with, even though I know most Silicon Valley devs run Mac OS and not Linux): Linux is overall better for development than OS X and Windows mainly because of its customization. I tested and approved Linux vs Windows except on an old computer because it doesn't have the technology to control it. Manually overclock all of the cores in memory (set them to like 4 Ghz) and run stability tests (in windows). I would like to know the difference in performance of a laptop, running Linux (any distro) Vs Windows 10/8/7/XP It can general or specific, don't need exact the numbers. You can swap hardware, but beyond gsync vs freesync, there's little functionality difference. yes, you can buy other versions of Windows to, like Home, Pro etc. I then tried Windows which I’m more familiar with and got it to work fine. I run it on linux and I especially like the fact that everything is an object over the text base output in Linux. what can Linux do for me that Windows cannot The Linux development workflow is more sophisticated than Windows. And these tend to be less linux professionals That's a POV that i have overlooked. A device configured for Windows may have power management features that Linux can't use. I got my first Thinkpad a year ago, decided to add a dual boot with Linux Mint, don't think I went in Windows more than a handful of times after that so eventually ditched it completely. Windows and Linux have over the years become more similar and more divergent in other areas. So my question is: is there anything that can be done on Resolve+Linux that Windows or MacOS can't? Great question. Every single valid set of benchmarks we have has Linux about 5-10% slower on average vs Windows. By default. But I have Cygwin and zsh so I can pretend I am on a linux machine. I'm a dev, I find dev ergonomics are better on Linux. Servers run Linux more often than Windows. This is considerably better for Linux given the smaller percentage of Linux users compared to Windows. I'm not surprised, I've always had noticeably better performance in Java games on Linux than Windows. Thing is that I don't know if there are any advantages of using Resolve on Linux VS. 7) Never bricked a Linux computer (in 17 years). I appreciate both Linux and Windows. Linux community is known for their toxicity due to the knowledge that they held but it is the ignorant Linux users and windows users that spearding misinfo: Linux is only for your shit hardware, save your recent on for the clearly better, more expensive OS, windows. 0 driver, while windows remained stuck on opengl 4. deb file from debian. With Windows I get full software compatibility and never have to worry about stupid Linux-specific issues. This is on top of the performance overhead that comes with having to run your Windows games through DirectX translation layers. And now you can even use WSL, a built in vm on windows that lets you run various flavors of linux. The game tested at 1440p, using custom settings provided by Digital Foundry. Proton is also built into the desktop version of Steam for Linux. Dir on windows does the same thing. Well, that and all the DRM. Linux is uncharged whereas a Windows license can start as low as $50. It's not. There are pros and cons to both, but I prefer a native Linux installation over the virtualization route. Machine Learning (the most compute intensive CS filed as of today) is 100% done on Linux. One comment that I have about the StackOverflow comment numbers that were given, OP mentioned 25/2500 for Linux vs 50/10000 for Windows. But the core of them is so similar I have even found bugs that affect both operating systems the same. I don't know if that is still a major factor to account for why often new installs of Linux are so power-hungry. If you are going to heavily use containers, use Linux. I do embedded development, and having to jump around from zsh to powershell constantly really irks me. I think I can squeeze 2 hours max on Linux so that’s about it If you aren't into that, some of the limitations with Linux (support for games (Proton is great, it isn't the same and pretending otherwise is doing everyone a disservice)), support for the Adobe Suite, support for Microsoft Office native apps, support for apps like Affinity, support for Pro Tools) that take an extended amount of work to get The change from Windows XP to 7 to 8 to 10 is probably no more jarring and disruptive than the change from any Windows to any Linux, so far as user interface goes. TBH Windows has a lot of layers that compromise performance too. linux is quite different from windows, or at least initially. I can often use drivers for Windows 7 or maybe even XP on a current Windows 10. If you're looking for tech support, /r/Linux4Noobs is a friendly community that can help you. Please kid, don't try to play with adults. I was trying to install Linux on a windows laptop. But the manufacturers are all moving their DRM and market-segmentation code to opaque firmwares, now, so they can call a clean interface from Linux, from macOS, from Windows, or from whatever else. In general Windows is designed for users when Linux is designed for engineers. My current PC isn't able to be upgraded to Windows 11, and the worry of my PC becoming a brick scares me, so I'm wondering In VMWare environments, for example, it's important to choose the right guest type (Windows, Linux, other) because this affects things as how VMWare and the VM guest tools interact with the hypervisor layer. I recommend Ubuntu Server (or other equivalent Linux-based server OS). For that, Windows would simply not work well, as it would be too slow. I switch between unix (macOS), linux and windows on a daily basis and for most purposes, Python itself is the same on all environments - in fact it is good practice to avoid relying on a specific operating system, so, for example, using pathlib rather than os when dealing with folder names, file searches, etc. I much prefer running Linux as the host and Windows in a VM for the rare occasions I need it. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. There's no real reason to switch OSes just for Flutter. In Linux the kernel is made by different people than those making the GNU tools, or those making the basic userland, or those packaging it all together. This is apparently a very hard problem to solve. Advantage: Linux. I have also tried Linux subsystem and it only works if you actually have the files on the Linux side otherwise it seems to be a lot slower when using a mount point. The question wasn't in regards to Windows performance, but the Linux performance at 4K. Linux has a steep learning curve, isn't very user friendly even though that has gotten a LOT better over the years. Proton now seamlessly plays Windows games over the native Linux Steam client. There are some sessions where the 6) Electronic stores, yes. I think I can do 4 - 5 hours on Windows unplugged. 04 for this test and a freshly installed Windows 10 Pro. The whole windows CRLF vs Linux LF thing is also annoying. A laptop of that age won't have useful hardware decoding support anyway, so windows video playback will use a lot of power anyway, but I'd expect Linux to be worse. Linux is better in about every regard except gaming and battery life. Darktable is the Lightroom equivalent for Linux and I've heard things about it but Lightroom is still a superior But I do get tired of people hating on Win 10 and acting like if your in the professional / IT / Dev world that basically linux is the given choice. They are both fairly similar and on windows, there is PowerShell. The laptop comes with Windows 11. People do a major disservice to hapless readers when they unreservedly tout Linux as "better" than Windows. Even with a fully tweaked linux distro (tlp, powertop, clock restrictions) battery life never once has beaten windows on any of my laptops. NET, então se em algum momento eu precisar lidar com uma aplicação legado eu vou precisar lidar com o windows, pra outras soluções, se forem web eu geralmente desenvolvo no windows e implanto no linux usando docker. It used to be true, but i feels now linux pretty much compare to Windows as far as battery is concerned. I tested using Debian, assuming you didn't have a webbrowser, knew how to use curl and dpkg but not apt, it'd take ~5 CUrl commands to navigate to the chromium package page with the download link for the . Not just Windows, better than MacOS too. Touch ID and sync with other apple devices is really In the windows world otoh, drivers are developed by third parties outside of the kernel, and there are more stable interfaces. Windows Server costs a shit-ton more than (insert Linux distro here; Debian 6 immediately comes to mind). Linux overhead would get lighter, in theory, with Wayland instead of X11 but that didnt materialize (yet). In both operating systems, all background tasks were killed to the best of my ability. on the flip side: all 3 os's have their instabilities. I'm not trying to sell you on anything and YMMV. Linux is a great OS for many reasons, but for automation work it's bound to just get in the way. Mine is new hardware, you can say 8th gen intel processor. Laptops' manufacturers usually include proprietary battery optimisations in their OEM Windows installation, that you won't be able to benefit from in Linux (or if you wipe your Windows installation for a fresh one). A Windows file-server has no headaches from an end-user; but a DC does, a print server does, so it depends on 'where/what' the windows server is/does. On Linux you still have access to IDEs such as Code Blocks, Eclipse, etc. If you're looking to break free from the succubus that is MS, then yes, Linux freedom is priceless. e. 26. Unless you're using a Pentium 3 with Windows 11, it sounds like extreme exaggeration, or an utterly broken windows install. Also, system requirements. This changed the results from 20% and 5% less FPS compared to Win + DX11 and Win How much safer is Linux than windows? From both malware and companies farming personal information From a malware perspective, Linux is indeed way more secure than Windows due to the very fact that those malwares literally cannot run on Linux - binaries are completely different so you have that - plus the fact there are way less viruses in quantity compared to Windows. org. I’d start with Linux, and if it “isn’t working” switch to Windows. It's not just Linux that wants open-source drivers. Along with this the Linux port isn't as efficient as it could be, which also slightly reduces performance. Edit: a reason for changing OS is to build for that OS. MacOS, android, BSD, all look a lot like Linux. But yes, Linux. TL;DR: Windows and Linux are essentially the same, and steal from each other all the time, but at their very core, they're mostly still operating on basic technologies designed in the 70s. Although I haven't used Windows with WSL, so I might change my mind. Things like: general driver support (especially hardware such as new GPUs), , and pretty much any 3D application these days. been using linux only for a few months now,left windows behind, been distro hoping a lot,but in terms of gaming cant say ive had issues running games, i am using steam, lutris and it has worked great, great alternative programs for windows, aside from learning some command lines, the experience has been better, had to learn some things to make Hello! I have a Linux workstation with Resolve on it and I'd like to offer my services to people around me. We all pretty much use Linux in our lab, so everything just works together nicely by sticking to that, but for personal use I prefer Windows. You can customize more then most are aware. improve the file system, get rid of antivirus It's not that windows is particularly unsuited for deep learning, it's more that environment and package management is sooo much more tedious and finicky on windows than on Linux. I'm willing to do that to get a console like experience but rarely is it better then Windows. Thea reason on Linux performs better is due to the nature of the game itself since it's single-threaded, so it gains from raw clock speed instead of multi core. That’s starting to change… In Windows you are only using IIS which is native and makes everything faster. Yes, you still can do workarounds like Wine or Proton to make the vast majority of games work, but yet it will cost you your time, patience and some performance in general. Please also check out: https://lemmy. I suspect that Plex on Linux preforms better than on Windows for two reasons: 1) native Linux file systems (e. Hard to say in which direction windows goes in the future but if windows gets some competition i think more pro consumer stuff will happen. It's not a perfect solution, but it's better than doing everything in Windows. A lot of environments use some form of Linux so it's definitely useful to learn. Eventually the same will eventually apply to amd cards. Windows just works, and it has all of the software that I'd ever need. Desktops? – there are IT supported distributions (it costs, just like real support costs with Windows). So in a sense you can say Linux is developed like a monolitic kernel, and Windows like a hybrid kernel. Was wondering if it's better to spin up Linux VMs in Windows or Linux or if it matters. Linux is good except for video playback in a browser, windows is still much better. This is a community for sharing news about Linux, interesting developments and press. Linux is growing while Windows is on a decline. Users share their opinions and experiences on the advantages and disadvantages of Windows 11 and Linux as operating systems. In this video, I am comparing Cyberpunk 2077 on Linux and Windows. Although it somewhat depends on the specific hardware, but Windows gives the best battery life in most cases. If you use Adobe software or other big names that don't support Linux use windows, if your more familiar with windows us it. exe), I switched my work laptop to opensuse TW. I use windows 11 because I game and its a pain to do on linux. That and at times I personally use just a lightweight program like Notepad++ because when you want to write something quickly it takes far fewer clicks to knock out a code. Windows has users in mind. So, stick with Windows if it's what you know and it works for you. Windows is really bottom of the barrel unless you're working with a lot of Microsoft toolchains (which probably isn't the case with webdev unless you're full stack on ASP. ” Manipulating files and writing scripts, imo, is much easier on Linux. Yes, but in my new hardware Fedora is working too good. Linux > macOS > Windows IMO. Performance: CPU load RAM Battery Life Welcome to /r/Linux! This is a community for sharing news about Linux, interesting developments and press. In my old pc, I was able to run Manjaro Linux (Gnome) fine where Windows 7 was struggling. Minecraft java edition is the same for both windows and linux. I am told that having WSL2 means I don't need Linux. Throwing linux on your thinkpad isn't a requirement of being accepted into the "thinkpad Agreed, especially if you mix front end technologies like react with . With Xubuntu 20. Nvidia drivers on Linux are not as good as Windows. Linux file system is superior to Windows. Now with Proton added to Linux Steam, Windows games in your Steam library now have the Install button restored. On my system, CS2 on Linux gets about 18% less FPS (±8% depending on map) compared to Windows running DX11, and 2% less FPS (±9% depedning on map) compared to Windows running Vulkan. Jul 28, 2024 · Is it worth changing from windows 11 to Linux? Only you can answer that question. Chrome Os although it is built on Linux has support and easier to get help from the community. Vulkan games usually are the ones that will run faster on Linux. I found that most of the books I was reading and websites I found were all fit for Linux/Mac OS so, I did what I could. This way they keep using Windows, paying for Windows licenses, counting as Windows users, having their preferences decided by Microsoft (i. Honestly, I'd recommend Linux for Deep Learning based off my experiences. When you're programming you'll probably want to be using the command line more. I'll leave it at that. If you're playing AAA games with kernel-level anticheat or if you just want the confidence that all games will work out of the box, it's best to stick with Windows. I have now a bit more battery life than windows actually. I love Linux, run it on my laptop, but let's not represent facts dishonestly. But it’s more of your business: if you want a different system with the advantages of Linux (security, open source, updates and that things you can read on any google search and ChatGPT blogs) but having limitations on Windows apps and some more reading (on the long road, Linux troubleshoot is wayyyy easier than Windows) or you want to use it Install ventoy on your pendrive, download some linux live ISO and the windows image, put it into ventoy, put that on the deck, from the live ISO partition your SSD, ( or, ready up an SD card to install windows ), install windows, download reFIND, put that on the SSD's EFI partition through the live ISO and configure reFIND so it sees both the There are pros and cons for both systems, unfortunately most of the cons for linux are usability issues due to having a smaller user base. IT support, lots of server support. " You talk about different scopes in your question. If you can migrate into something away from end-users you will be happier. so I'm using an HP Laptop, with Windows 10 and an Ubuntu Dual boot. It's a pain in the ass to recall ascii codes for special characters in Windows (I'm absolutely ocd about it) . Trabalho com ASP. Eu migrei de Windows pra Linux pelo fato do Windows entupir o pc de bloatware (meu pc não é dos melhores) então o Linux roda infinitamente mais liso e o fato de que com 1 comando vc atualiza 90% doq ta instalado no pc, facilitando pra caramba a vida kkkkk mas pra qm curte jogar por exemplo (principalmente joguim online) o So try the following in linux, test after each change. What I do is run both Windows and Linux on proxmox (which is a linux-based hypervisor VM). true. Cognitive dissonance is a hell of force to overcome "I am a savvy computer user" vs "Linux doesn't work for me" ironically only results in a more fierce protection of the decision to run Linux. :P All srs-ness, I'm kinda curious about this myself, as well as if whether or not Windows' ubiquity in this sphere is the fault of tech schools which focus on Microsoft software in their instruction (and thus, people's tendency to gravitate to that which they already know). Why Linux: no bloatware, open source, become more familiar using bash Why Windows: already installed, comes with Word and Excel Não acho q tenha um que é melhor pra desenvolver especificamente . OS, apps, the whole shebang. At work our Linux machines have uptimes measure in years, running many jobs 24x7. A user shares their honest experience of using Ubuntu and Windows 11 as desktop systems, listing the pros and cons of both. It depends on what your end goal is. Likewise you can make Linux your primary and launch Windows in a VM with graphics card acceleration just fine, but you will get an overhead penalty. It is giving me more battery life compared with These days most developer tools start out on Linux and later get ported to Windows (often with a sub-par experience). Linux, especially with a lightweight desktop environment or even just the command line, Linux is the better choice. Read relevant chapters of The Social Animal. Members Online Discussion on potential of WSL as a substitute for Windows/Linux dual-boot for gaming/Office apps That's why I partially agree with his statement that if one cannot use Linux, they might not be a programmer. I'm also not sure what you mean about the performance kernels. Windows puts itself front and centre and demands your attention, updates for example seem to take an age. People use Windows for desktops more often than Linux. One thing I prefer about BSD distributions vs Linux, is the development is all central for the core system. I've been mostly on Linux the past decade and the only ongoing issue I've had in terms of the Windows vs Linux debate is the unavailability of Microsoft Office and the Adobe suite. Linux is an OS used by a significant proportion of programmers in the world. but 80% of them is same, except for Unless you need DFS, Distributed File System, go with Linux. I come from Windows and am on linux the last 3 years or so. Zorin OS is an Ubuntu-based Linux distribution designed especially for newcomers to Linux. I am dual booting windows and Linux so I can see the difference. I actually like Windows Server, but I wanted to see which could provide a better gaming experience specifically for Minecraft Bedrock Server. There is a reason why Linux is free because its shit. That gives you both on one system, both at the same time, both at (almost) full speed, with no compromises. But ha! Windows just wouldn’t recognize the stick! Most AAA games that are now natively compatible on Linux run better on Linux than Windows. I used to use a Mac and not really think about Linux or Windows much. IIRC it's not that NTFS is inherently slower - more that Windows' file-handling has so many layers and checks/hooks/etc in it that it winds up being slow as hell. If you literally accept all of the default configuration options for both RHEL/Ubuntu and Windows Server 2019 Linux is probably slightly more secure than Windows, but not by a massive margin. Same with Wolfenstein: Youngblood. I think Windows Vista used around 4GB of RAM after a fresh install while Ubuntu was more like under a GB. One of the biggest easy-to-change differences used to be people using Linux but not switching on hardware video acceleration for their device. Installing and managing node and friends is just a lot more easier on Linux. But one of my old hp pavilion touch model the battery life is almost equal to windows just by installing tlp. Also Linux is more fun than Windows :P I'm an ex-Windows user who has been using Linux for about 4 years (switched because of a partitioning mistake). News, Discussion, and Support for Linux Mint The Linux Mint Subreddit: for news, discussion and support for the Linux distribution Linux Mint. Since this is a windows reddit i already know that most people here prefer windows. net as backend. On Linux no one really uses the AMD binary blob driver unless they have a specific need that doesn't run well or at all the the MESA drivers that come with the OS. This is important so you can see if the cpu is thermal throttling. I had a windows PC with Linux dual boot, but I had so many problems updating drivers and general comparability with my Nvidia GPU and just randomly getting a black screen either at the OS selection prompt or in Linux. Doom Eternal with Nvidia runs faster on Linux than Windows. The Linux market share is somewhere around 0-2% and Windows is somewhere around 30-40%+. The main difference between windows and Linux in this sense is that on Linux most things are done via command line and on Windows most things are done using a graphical GUI. But basically every other automation software vendor supports windows primarily. Keep in mind, I never used linux because of privacy or morality, I just liked the operating system more then windows. Both Windows and Linux are totally capable of being configured to be "secure" (as defined by any standard). I would recommend dual-booting a Linux distro with Windows to have the learning experience without fully committing at first if you're uncertain It's very fragile environment compared to running Linux as the host OS. On linux it's more likely to achive full potential since there is less stuff going under the hood compared to windows. On the contrary, Windows 10/11 isn't Since most things will always be local based i think linux makes actually sense for people which like freedom. So, I'm too poor to get a decent computer. But I usually have my P50 plugged in at all times. g. A few months ago, I would have said to go Linux unless you need a Windows-specific feature. social/m/Linux Please refrain from posting help requests here, cheers. Even with opengl, the linux driver supports a newer opengl specification than the windows one. So if your DE crashed in Linux or MacOS you just restart the XOrg or whatever MacOS graphical stack is calling and problem solved, the system is still operating normally, but Windows must be rebooted because for Windows DE crash is a kernel level crash hence BSOD. Gotta build a Windows machine for my media/gaming center. If Linux community welcomed New Users and not call them names maybe they would stay with Linux. It is more about the vendors giving a crap about supporting the stack. Under Linux you can cross-compile to Windows using mingw32-w64 (it is a native Linux version of the windows GCC port and produces windows executables under Linux) and to OS X using Apple's GCC set up to be a cross-compiler (you can do it yourself, but some people seem to use prebuilt version like this). Running games on Linux you're almost always taking a hit on fps. When I want to watch Netflix, and dick around. Mar 1, 2023 · Out of interest, is there any actual difference between Windows and Linux when using the same hardware, as far as power consumption goes? I am considering giving Linux a go on my laptop Aug 16, 2024 · I currently have Windows 10 installed on my desktop and recently have noticed that it runs quite slow sometimes. Linux is free and open source. Then there's the lack of window management options, lack Take intel hd4000 - linux got working vulkan 1. So even if you have a Linux host you'll end up putting windows on a VM anyways. While I'm tempted to download Linux, I wonder if there is really much benefit to me switching the pre-installed Windows 11 for Linux. A good Linux distro with TLP or similar tool can sometimes get close but it's rare you will find any case where Windows doesn't win this specific battle. " This is a subreddit for War Thunder, a cross platform vehicular combat MMO developed by Gaijin Entertainment for Microsoft Windows, macOS, Linux, PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5, Xbox One and Xbox Series X|S. There are likely performance differences between DirectX and Vulkan for your particular graphics card. Linux is great, though I admit I wasn't great at using it. Na minha situação, eu uso windows tanto pra trabalho e desenvolvimento. For example, ls on Linux is to list files in your current directory. The Windows and Linux drivers are nearly identical. X vs Xwayland vs Wayland, is seccomp or lxc in use, alsa vs pulse vs pipewire, xdg portals, the list goes on. The lack of performance comes from the fact that 2. With my recent (february) XPS 15 7590 Dell, under Windows freshly installed and up to date, 27-35 watts, sometimes runs up to 60 watts in web mode and no action or video. My solution is running a Windows VM via libvirt/Qemu/KVM. The distribution's ultimate goal is to provide a Linux alternative to Windows and let Windows users enjoy all the features of Linux without complications. It all comes down to what you like and what your comfortable with. MacOS is basically linux but everything works and looks better. khuo empse nlgnsme jphwjii moeyx rjq reyf ktjk qdomq bdl