Salt vs puppet Ansible I use for thing I know are "always on", since it's a push. The setup of Puppet is a nightmare compared to ansible. Each tool has its strengths and Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and Learn the difference between five popular orchestration and automation tools for cloud-native applications: Ansible, Terraform, Chef, Salt, and Puppet. Also agree that puppet is in decline vs ansible, so ansible expertise is more in demand. SaltStack, then your search ends here. They do not attempt to solve the problem of provisioning or updating infrastructure, containers, or serverless resources. GitLab. This blogpost chronicles the investigation, our findings, and how we are Rundeck vs Salt: What are the differences? Introduction: In the world of automation and infrastructure management, Rundeck and Salt are popular tools used by organizations. Puppet is built to support bigger deployments as your needs grow, which is why lots of organizations choose Puppet for infrastructure automation and configuration management. But stay away from Puppet & Chef. Terraform vs Chef. However, if you are making immutable infra, where nothing is ever changed, then Chef, Puppet, and Salt have overhead and features that aren't needed. Some organizations are small and lean — they might work in regulated industries where compliance and visibility are key. SaltStack’s push-based automation model can be great for quick changes, but Puppet’s pull-based agent automation lets you continuously enforce desired state across Linux and Windows. Bottom Line: Ansible vs. 👉 See the Difference for Yourself: Get a Demo of Puppet vs. Ansible is unbeatable for those who value simplicity and quick setup; Puppet offers unparalleled consistency and state enforcement; Salt is the go-to for real-time data execution in massive infrastructures; and Chef excels Both Puppet and SaltStack offer server configuration and automation. Because This presentation "Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack" will compare the DevOps configuration management tools Chef, Puppet, Ansible and Saltstack in terms of their capabilities, architecture, performance, ease of setup, language, scalability and pros and cons. ly/2 Puppet has a strong focus on enforcing and managing system configurations, making it suitable for large and complex environments with strict configuration requirements. It uses a master and minion approach for keeping servers in defined states. We know that Salt and Ansible are more designed for SysAdmins (which we are). Salt overview A configuration management system, motivated by the idea of enabling high-speed communication with large numbers of systems Capable of maintaining remote nodes in defined states (for example, ensuring that specific packages are installed and specific services are running) Written in Python, Salt offers a push method and an SSH O Salt, também conhecido como SaltStack, é uma ferramenta de automação e gerenciamento de configuração de código aberto baseada em Python. The tool has gained considerable traction in the enterprise for its performance Interest over time of Salt and Puppet Note: It is possible that some search terms could be used in multiple areas and that could skew some graphs. Ansible vs. 2 stars with 23 reviews. In the case of Ansible vs. At a Glance; Pricing Puppet Enterprise vs SaltStack. Fails frequently at scale due to SSH and assumes a hands-on-CLI approach for most uses much like Terraform. Puppet Labs has announced the Windows Module Pack, which brings you a quality set of modules that are Windows specific. They challenge you to describe the desired state better as opposed to writing complicated procedures that soon become unreadable. In fact, that's how we manage our laptops, with puppet. For this purpose, Ansible is When comparing SaltStack vs Puppet, the Slant community recommends SaltStack for most people. This is still better supported with Puppet. Agent-based: Requires a Puppet agent on managed nodes. Salt also includes a GUI tool called Halite; but this is still a poor, version 0. And today, we want to answer all the important questions. Ele utiliza um modelo mestre/subordinado, onde o mestre emite comandos que são executados pelos subordinados. 04 will arrive in 4-6 weeks. Ansible vs HashiCorp Consul. The main advantages of Ansible are: simplicity and ease of use, whereas SaltStack is scalable, fast and flexible software for data automation. Progress Chef and Puppet provide more granular control mechanisms and robust features, making them suitable for complex 🔥Caltech University Post Graduate Program In Cloud Computing: https://www. I got a lot done with it. Linux. Ansible vs Puppet Enterprise. It's a lot more powerful than Puppet, Chef, & Ansible. Salt is similar, but Python-based - if you have more folks in-house who are familiar with Python. agents connect with the other master in the list. Using YAML, Jinja or Python, you can define formulas or states for Salt vs. Configuration Management vs Provisioning. PuppetDB: Centralized data store for Puppet. Both Salt and Ansible use YAML to describe their States/Playbooks. Created by Thomas Hatch in 2011, Salt—now known as SaltStack—is a modular, Python-based CM tool designed for high-speed data collection/execution. Puppet vs. Chef, Puppet, and Ansible are powerful tools in the DevOps ecosystem, primarily used for Configuration Management, automation, and orchestration of complex tasks. mgmt never caught on, and chef is effectively down and out, but chef was always a Interoperability Salt Master works only on Linux/Unix but Salt minions can work on windows as well Puppet Master works only on Linux/Unix but Puppet Agent also works on windows Scalability Ease of Setup Availability Management Interoperability Ansible supports windows machines as well but the Ansible server has to be in Linux/Unix machine Chef Ansible vs Salt – What’s the Difference? (Pros and Cons). While Jenkins is a continuous integration and delivery platform that helps automate the building, testing, and deployment of software, Puppet Labs provides infrastructure Chef vs Salt: What are the differences? Orchestration vs Configuration management: Chef is primarily designed for configuration management, which involves defining and enforcing system configurations across multiple nodes. vs. 1 Overview. Saltstack - Saltstack is the company behind the Salt remote cluster configuration management tool. "Your check for $0. See all alternatives. snydeq writes "InfoWorld's Paul Venezia provides an in-depth review of Puppet, Chef, Ansible, and Salt — four leading configuration management and orchestration tools, each of which takes a different path to server automation. Desired State 代表的な自動化ツールには、Ansible、Terraform、Puppet、Chef、Salt などがありますが、Ansible はエンドツーエンドの自動化向けに、柔軟で安定したセキュリティ重視の基盤を提供します。この記事では、Red Hat® Ansible® Automation Platform と他の一般的なオープンソース hi all, ignore the ignorance but arnt ansible,salt,jenkins all automation tools and arnt they all the same apart from ansible being agentless, i dont know about jenkins tho thanks, rob. Configurations with more than one master instance always have a single Salt Master that Puppet, Chef, Salt, and Ansible are all at heart trying to do the same thing: manage files, packages, and services on machines. It’s not mean that smaller companies won’t take benefit of these tools, as automation and orchestration generally make administrator life easier in an infrastructure of any size. There are more than 25 alternatives to Puppet for a variety of platforms, including Linux, Windows, Mac, Web-based and BSD apps. mcollective fills the same niche in the Puppet world, but 出典 Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack: Which Works Best For You? 全ての指標でAnsibleはChef,Saltを同等かそれ以上である。 特にChefはRubyベースのDSLというところがツライ。 Python, YMLはDockerやAIで慣れているが、RubyはもはやRedmineくらいでしか使わない。 人気度の比較 It is fast in big installations too and allows for detection of local events via beacons. Because A highly opinionated comparison between Salt and Ansible. The Puppet cross-platform orchestration tool comes in an open source version, as well as in a commercially supported Enterprise edition, which however is not entirely open source. 4. It includes a briefing and comparison. 2 Key Features. Ruby is so far not my thing, but hey Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack are created to manage large infrastructures with 10,000 servers on Google, There is also a Salt SSH format - "agent-free" management. As customers could use anything really I try to give them at least the basics of it all. Setting up Puppet is a more hands-on task and pushing the puppet agents to all the boxes is another issue. Fabric vs. Our answer was simple: “No, we have no clear reason as to why this has occurred and it is bizarre I would rather shoot myself in the head than touch another Puppet instance again. Let’s dive into the specific line-items you’ll want to consider between Ansible vs. In the ever-evolving landscape of Configuration Management and deployment, these three giants stand tall, each All groups and messages Salt vs Puppet Bolt: What are the differences? Salt: Fast, scalable and flexible software for data center automation. Salt introduced its own set of brokenness and vmware can't get out of its own way. ansible battle has a different approach towards automation and configuration management. Puppet: “Learn more about the Puppet open source projects that are used by more than 35,000 companies worldwide, including 75% of the Fortune 100. Salt” written by Paul Venezia, that prompted many people in the configuration management community to get in touch with us to ask why CFEngine was not included. Puppet and Chef are similar conceptually, as Salt and Ansible are also similar to each other. Guest = the virtual machine running on your workstation (and Vagrant or Docker uses). Ansible, Chef, Puppet & Salt - these are for maintaining specific configuration on machines. Architecture. Puppet: Key Features to Note . Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. Chef and Puppet require agents running on the nodes while Ansible relies on SSH for the connection. Puppet is the most widely adopted of the platforms, and Chef is the cheapest. Puppet shines in large-scale environments, offering superior scalability and deep visibility into its operations. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for Hashicorp Terraform-vs-Salt Stack. A configuração do Salt envolve a instalação do mestre Salt em um servidor central e dos subordinados Salt nos nós Salt（商业化产品称为 SaltStack）于 2020 年被 VMware 收购，纳入成为 vRealize Automation 产品组合的一部分，该产品组合最近更名为 VMware Aria Automation。VMware 于 2022 年被 Broadcom 收购。 Puppet 由 Perforce 提供支持，可用于包括 Puppet Enterprise 和 Puppet Bolt 在内的一系列商业产品。. In the process we discovered a number of security vulnerabilities (CVE-2022-22934, CVE-2022-22935, CVE-2022-22936). Modules: Organize manifests for reuse. The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. It is the ‘simple configuration management, task execution, application deployment and multi-node orchestration engine. #azure #aws #devops #awsdevops #devopstools #ansible #saltstack #chef #puppet Best Configuration Management Tool In 2024 | Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Salts SUSE Manager vs Puppet. They each have pros and cons. Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Salt overview A configuration management system, motivated by the idea of enabling high-speed communication with large numbers of systems Capable of maintaining remote nodes in defined states (for example, ensuring that specific packages are installed and specific services are running) Written in Python, Salt offers a push method and an SSH The Puppet Master compiles the declarative code into catalogs, which are then distributed to Puppet Agents installed on managed nodes. Any of these is better than none of them, and they all are extremely capable tools. Ansible, Puppet and Chef Competing configuration management products all have distinct methods of specifying configurations and dependencies. This is amazing for broadcasting fixes, and working with systems where you can't afford a live CM minion (e. In this competitive comparison blog, find out why organizations choose to switch from SaltStack to Puppet for infrastructure automation and configuration management. Therefore, if you are also looking for Chef vs. See side-by-side comparisons of product capabilities, customer experience, pros and cons, and reviewer demographics to find the best fit for your organization. If you are a windows shop and you can pay for Chef, Puppet, Ansible, and Salt are all popular configuration management tools. Every platform in the chef vs. The best four tools include Chef, Puppet, Ansible, to SaltStack. Which configuration management or deployment automation tool you use will depend on Salt feels a little bit more like a toolkit than a tool. By default, Puppet requires an agent on each client, which adds complexity and additional effort to configuration and roll-out for new systems. One reason why I love Ansible over Puppet over Chef (Salt is somwhere between the latter two) I need to recreate a lot of environments on regular basis as I am responsible for enabling our SEs and PS staff in terms of devops. edureka. Like the two options above it is a This presentation "Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack" will compare the DevOps configuration management tools Chef, Puppet, Ansible and Saltstack in terms of their capabilities, architecture, performance, ease of I have used all four. I started with Puppet. Customers of Ansible. Ansible and Salt are community open source IT automation tools. Puppet has a rating of 4. Ansible vs AWS Config. Puppet, Chef, Ansible, and Salt for OpenStack all claim to make it This presentation "Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack" will compare the DevOps configuration management tools Chef, Puppet, Ansible and Saltstack in terms of their capabilities, architecture, performance, ease of setup, language, scalability and pros and cons. By using a model-driven approach with imperative task execution and Puppet, Salt, Chef, and Ansible are among the most popular configuration management tools used by organizations worldwide. IT automation using The distinctive difference between Ansible vs Puppet vs Chef is the underlying script. In the question "What are the best configuration management tools?" SaltStack is ranked 1st while Puppet is ranked 4th Salt works around a Salt master which has multiple agents (Salt minions) that have a persistent connection to the master. Puppet . SaltStack. The following list shows the platform's most important components: Salt Master is the master daemon instance that controls client instances by issuing commands and configuration requests. the tools = ansible, chef, puppet and salt; provisioning; workstation = the laptop or desktop machine you are sitting at. Puppet. Chef vs. Puppet, Chef, Ansible, and Salt were all built to make it much easier to configure and maintain more than hundred of servers. If you’re researching Puppet vs. Chef, this blog will explain some of the commonalities between Puppet and Chef, what makes Puppet unique, and what to consider when researching Puppet vs. When I talk about ease of setup, let me add my personal Ansible, Puppet, Salt, and Chef make up 4 of the most commonly used open source IT automation tools. This architecture ensures centralized control and consistency across the infrastructure, while allowing for scalable management of thousands of nodes. Puppet and Ansible have larger and more established communities, which can be beneficial for users seeking help or looking to contribute to the tool. One thing that really irks me about Salt, though, is that they are very slow to fix bugs. So where does Ansible fit in the wider landscape of automation tools that includes Terraform, Puppet, Chef, and Salt? Each of these products is supported and takes a distinct approach to automation, and all are available as enterprise This blog helps you understand the differences between Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack and determine which among these tools suits you the best. g. There are a few other languages here but Puppet is also relatively high-skill in terms of management. discussion, general-linux. Discussions. Anyone watching a youtube video can easily set up ansible with minimal IT knowledge. Terraform, Ansible, Chef vs Puppet, and Pulumi are essential tools for efficient and effective infrastructure management, enhancing operations, reducing errors, and accelerating development and deployment pipelines. Chef differs When comparing SaltStack vs Puppet, the Slant community recommends SaltStack for most people. SaltStack's architecture is based on the server/client model. It seems that Puppet, Chef, Ansible and Salt are the big names in the server automation/configuration field. DSL (Domain-Specific Language): Puppet language for configurations. Consider your requirements and preferences to make an informed Based on verified reviews from real users in the Continuous Configuration Automation Tools market. Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification; Salt: Fast, scalable Chef - Build, destroy and rebuild servers on any public or private cloud. All 4 are available as enterprise versions sold by different corporate entities: Red Hat® Ansible® Automation Platform is supported by Red Hat. co/devops-certification-training🔥 Subscribe Edureka Hindi Channel now for more free videos: http://bit. 6: 162: May 27, 2015 Which is your favourite Linux configuration management tool? Read 2 reviews from the world’s largest community for readers. Puppet, scale is at the heart of the comparison. 'Puppet, Chef, Ansible, and Salt were all built with that very goal in mind: to make it much easier to configure and maintain dozens, Salt vs Puppet vs Ansible vs ? i manage about 600 routers and servers, mostly cisco and juniper routers, servers are mostly living in an esxi cluster and are primarily ubuntu (some as old as 10) with a few dozen centos 6 systems, and a few gentoo, plus about 100 windows servers (mostly 2008 and 2012, a few 2003 stragglers). Salt if you have to and don't mind learning something that will eventually become deprecated. We have seen a lot of questions on the comparison of Infrastructure as Code (IAC) tools. Chef, Puppet, and Ansible are all configuration management tools, designed to install and manage software on existing servers whereas CloudFormation and Terraform are provisioning tools Comparing the customer bases of Puppet and Salt Open, we can see that Puppet has 11511 customer(s), while Salt Open has 44 customer(s). In short, Ansible excels in pricing, ease-of-use, and community size, making it an ideal choice for organizations seeking a user-friendly automation tool for basic IT environments. It allows users to define the desired state of a system and Chef takes care of converging the actual state to the desired state. With respect to DSC, it is still a young product but it is getting better every time there is a new release. ” Vagrant: “Vagrant aims to mirror production environments by providing the same operating system, packages, users, and configurations giving users the flexibility to use their favorite Jenkins vs Puppet Labs: What are the differences? Introduction: Jenkins and Puppet Labs are both widely used tools in the field of software development and deployment. Puppet 4. Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible: Key Differences Explained Sienna Roberts 24 December 2024. Hashicorp Terraform Discussions 🔵 Intellipaat DevOps course: https://intellipaat. As with Chef, Puppet’s pull-based nature makes it suited to constantly changing cloud-native environments. Master Versus Masterless. , a cron job that runs every five minutes), and use If you want to 'maintain state' where any changes are automatically reverted, then something like Chef, Puppet, or Saltstack (my fav) are probably better choices. That’s not to say Puppet Labs vs Salt: What are the differences? Puppet Labs: Server automation framework and application. Supports both agent-based and agent-less management (salt-mionion, salt-ssh, salt-proxy, salt-sproxy). Ansible, like Chef, represents a procedural style of coding. But I found the Windows Salt minions to be problematic. Around the world in 2024, over 23167 companies have started using Ansible as Configuration Management tool. Compare Puppet Enterprise and SaltStack Save. Scheme of work. Log in to your account to save comparisons, products and more. Declarative: Describes the desired state of resources. This approach is simple and elegant. Pull Configuration: Another significant difference is the way configuration changes are applied. When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found SaltStack easier to use, set up, and administer. salt-sproxy is great when you want to manage hundreds of 12. However, reviewers felt that both vendors make it equally Configuration management: Salt vs Puppet I've spent some time experimenting with puppet and I have come to the conclusion that I don't much like it. I used Puppet at two employers, and went to Puppetconf 2013. Ansible vs ServiceNow Configuration Management Database. Thus, the first step to a post-quantum Salt was to examine what the protocol was actually doing. I believe they learned a lot observing the development process for Puppet and Chef, and benefit from the lessons learned by their predecessors. Puppet, Salt, Chef, and Ansible all have active and supportive user communities, with a wealth of documentation, tutorials, and resources available online. Currently my company doesn't use any sort of automation software but we are looking at some now and BigFix was one that another admin was suggesting. Ansible vs Chef. Those teams might look for something more “off the shelf” for automation needs when customization is not critical. Because SCCM Vs Puppet: In-depth, Major Differences. Push vs. More seriously, Salt is easy to understand and it met my needs. 1 effort – for example it only offers a Ansible and Salt are the new generation of CM tools. Chef and Puppet do have varying levels of support for masterless modes where you run just their agent software on each of your servers, typically on a periodic schedule (e. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e. The line chart is based on worldwide web search for the past 12 months. Welcome to the realm of IT Automation, where the battle of orchestration tools unfolds: Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible. Just wondering if anyone has used BigFix on here and what their thoughts are when it comes to using that versus say something like Puppet. There are several reasons why this is the case but the main ones are the module system that it uses and the way it abstracts away the configuration details on the client. All one needs is the source IP addresses and we are good to go. , a command-line tool) to issue new commands to the master server, and the master server either SCCM Vs Puppet: In-depth, Major Differences. com/devops-certification-training/In this Chef vs Puppet video, you will understand the difference between Puppet-vs-Salt Stack. Terraform vs Ansible. Every time you want to update something in your infrastructure, you use a client (e. It includes minimal input from developers and sysadmins. Also Check : Types of input such as Terraform variables, output variables, and how to define them in terraform configuration. Ansible feels kludgy and slow compared to puppet, so it hurts that it is taking over. The major problem with all of these solutions is that they are dramatically more expensive than our existing Salt uses a bespoke cryptographic protocol to secure its communication. All four configuration management We know that Chef, Puppet, Salt, and Ansible are all capable of doing this. Ansible if you want to learn an industry standard (Redhat bought Ansible and they have the largest Linux server marketshare) that will still be around in 10+ years. Salt has full support for 12. security, overhead). Which would you recommend to learn? I'm seeing that Ansible has the least steep learning curve, is that right? I also think Ansible vs Puppet. While Puppet is coded in Ruby, Ansible utilizes Python and YAML scripts, and Chef is built on Ruby like Puppet; however, in the Puppet Vs. In the Configuration Management category, with 11511 customer(s) Puppet stands at 3rd place by ranking, while Salt Open with 44 customer(s), is at the 22nd place. Salt - Fast, scalable and flexible software for data center automation 3. When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Hashicorp Terraform easier to use, set up, and administer. Chef for your infrastructure automation and configuration management needs. Puppet is also pull, and though it runs Ruby, Puppet DSL and Embedded Ruby, Puppet also suffers from not being YAML compatible. Ansible vs Perforce. Salt and Red Hat Ansible are newer -- released in 2011 and 2012, respectively -- than Puppet, which came out in 2005, and Chef , which debuted in 2009. When I heard my first mention of Salt I considered it too young, back in 2013. puppet vs. Have a look: If you don't have a lot of in-house Ruby knowledge, Chef and Puppet can be somewhat daunting (Chef moreso than Puppet in this regard). While both Rundeck and Salt aim to streamline operations and improve efficiency, there Head-to-head comparison: Chef vs. Puppet Enterprise, Puppet Bolt and other products are supported by Perforce. Using YAML, Jinja or Python, you can define formulas or states for This talk will cover the pros and cons of four different OpenStack deployment mechanisms. Puppet is an automation application designed to manage large and complex infrastructures. SaltStack, on the other hand, Ansible’s simplicity, Chef and Puppet’s flexibility, and SaltStack’s real-time capabilities each cater to different use cases. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet. Ansible is an IT automation tool. Chef. OpenStack is an attempt to answer the question “what if provisioning VMs and such into our datacenter was like a cloud Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. Easy to define my own structure, use the parts of Salt that I like and ignore the others, and build my own scripts and workflows for doing things the way I want. The best one is the one that fits your organization business requirements. com/pgp-cloud-computing-certification-training-course?utm_campaign=25A Puppet 是一种成熟的自动化工具，自 2005 年以来一直存在。它是由 Luke Kanies 创建的，他希望简化服务器管理并自动执行重复性任务。Puppet 旨在帮助 IT 团队实现从简单到复杂的基础架构自动化管理。Puppet 是一款开源工具，由一个庞大的开发者和用户社区提供支持。 Ansible: Gets you into tight spots by using SSH instead of a minion like Salt or Puppet. I’ve heard opinions from someone I respect that Puppet and Chef were complicated beasts to get up and running, and since I am a Python guy I’ve generally always kept an eye on Ansible and Salt. " :-) I think Ansible and the rest of the newer config mgmt systems made the right choice by making remote execution part of the core system. Ease of Setup. Choosing the right tools for DevOps solutions and automation services is a bit cumbersome. Compare Hashicorp Terraform and SaltStack Hashicorp Terraform vs SaltStack. Table of We use both Puppet and Chef in production, so I'd like to emphasize the primary difference per the article: The declarative nature of Puppet may seem constraining, but those constraints are usually for your own good. When comparing SaltStack vs Puppet, the Slant community recommends SaltStack for most people. Puppet, Chef, Ansible, and Salt were all built with that very goal in mind: to make it much easier to configure and maintain dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of servers. 10+ year user of Puppet, and 2+ year user of Chef. Ansible과 Terraform, Puppet, Chef, Salt와 같은 주요 자동화 툴의 차이를 이해하고, 각 툴의 특징과 사용 사례를 비교하여 최적의 솔루션을 선택하세요. Puppet Labs - Server automation framework and application. Ansible follows a push-based model, where the control machine pushes configurations to the nodes, while Puppet Labs and Salt use a pull-based model where nodes periodically check in with a central server to retrieve and apply configurations. Based in Python, Salt offers a push method and an SSH method of communication with clients. Some time ago was set to evaluate configuration management systems. As someone who has used all of them (yes all of them, puppet, chef, ansible, salt, cfengine). Easy for non-developers to use. Last month Infoworld published an article titled “Review: Puppet vs. Both can simplify IT operations and DevOps work by automating routine tasks such as configuring and provisioning systems, deploying software, and All these are managed using various modules – Salt-cloud, Salt-virt, Salt-vagrant, Salt-monitor and Salt-ui. If not Salt, then I would go Ansible. First of all, However, Puppet has a more declarative style, just like Terraform. i want to put some I have used Salt for exactly this purpose, along with installing Chocolatey packages. SaltStack (or Salt) is a CLI-based tool that can be set up as a master-client model or a non-centralized model. Therefore it has multiple masters to configure salt minions. 8 stars with 33 reviews. They expect the machine to already be provisioned (although again, there are ways to boot up a machine with all of these). Chef vs Puppet vs Salt vs Ansible. SaltStack has a rating of 3. Salt vs Puppet : Which is Better? Salt. Back to top Ansible vs. My Salt states are littered with Compare Salt and Puppet and decide which is better. Puppet is described as 'Data Center Automation Solution helps you save time, gain visibility into your server environment, and ensure consistency across your IT infrastructure' and is a popular app in the office & productivity category. simplilearn. 🔵 Edureka DevOps Training : https://www. By default, Chef and Puppet require that you run a master server for storing the state of your infrastructure and distributing updates. undefined IBM BigFix vs Puppet . These tools help you install and manage software on existing cloud infrastructure, either for bootstrapping a virtual machine, or patching one. Puppet Configuration setup and language Both Chef and Puppet use the pull configuration, which automatically takes configurations from the central server without Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Chef, Puppet, Ansible, and SaltStack are industry-wide used?, Puppet, Chef, Ansible, and Salt are all?, Puppet, Chef, Ansible, and Salt were all built with this goal in mind: and more. Manifests: Define resources and relationships. And based on those experiences, I recommend Puppet, which I have never touched. Vocabulary. Puppet also ensures the bastion VPN is brought up once the user logs in, as long as their keyfob is inserted. There is a Puppet community module for DSC that does a pretty good job of 1:1 mapping resources to types/providers You should check out SaltStack. Saltstack has both open source and enterprise versions. SaltStack takes a new approach to infrastructure management by developing software that is easy enough to get running in seconds, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to control and communicate with them in milliseconds I'd personally choose puppet, but that's because it has an agent to phone home, and not overly familiar with salt. cukze xptea kuqa zaaiib wqwg bwcclz pnavj lvawtz bqvv bij