Awaiting reviewer scores after revision. 2022 In peer review process 23.

Awaiting reviewer scores after revision Awaiting Editor Decision I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a paper on ScholarOne last month. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. 2022 awaiting final decision 24. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Show Review in Original Language (0) Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. The EiC usually reaches a decision within 3 days after receiving the AEs recommendation. g. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Does this indicate rejection? Asked on 19 Jan, 2021 It was submitted after revision. Among other reasons, this could be due to the field of study – perhaps it’s niche/super-specialized, interdisciplinary 2023. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. hhhggg123 2022-12-28 Hello friend, I would like to ask if I will receive an email after the first status "waiting for decision" to submit the revised manuscript? 3. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. Is it a bad sign? Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Meaning of ‘Awaiting reviewer scores’ (AE) will make a decision on your manuscript, such as to ask you to revise and resubmit (for a minor or major revision) or to reject the manuscript. . Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same day it changed back to "Under Review". 07 Awaiting SE Recommendation 12. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". I wrote 26 pages for the first review, and 13 pages for the second review, while my paper is only 13 pages long Aug 8, 2014 Jul 15, 2019 · Thus the follow-on status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent get with review. I just thought after all reviewer scores, getting the editor decision would be a relatively faster I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores . " Does this mean that my manuscript needs to go through another round of review? In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Please do not wait for an overdue reviewer without assigning additional reviewers, however, because the wait for a promising and nonperforming reviewer can lead to indefinite delay. In case one happened before the other, that could help clarify the 10. 14 review status changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" to "awaiting AE recommendation"; 2023. 05. 编辑部或审稿人正在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做 I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. 4 answers Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. Let's say the paper requires some revision based on reviewers. Someone said it was easy to be accepted by IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 2022 awaiting reviewer scores 22. For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. " I'm unsure what these status changes Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. Meanwhile, the editorial management system will be configured to Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. I submitted a manuscript to ScholarOne about 10 weeks ago. 22. academicjournalpublishing. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? I was told that for The system will continue to show "Awaiting reviewer scores" until all reviewers have submitted their reports. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. 8 Awaiting AE Recommendation 2023. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Asked 4 August 2021; Mohd Shariq; (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting Reviewer Scores. 30 Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Awaiting scores from One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. ” The ‘7’ indicates that the ‘Reviewer Scores are 1 week late’ e-mail should send when the due date is 7 days passed but the task has not been completed. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 12. It is just guessing. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" after a month. Also be available to answer questions and explain how to find answers if the question has stumped you. 6. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. Note that the time it takes for an editor to One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. Additionally, after the revised manuscript is returned, each author will receive an email requesting supplementary information about the authors What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. 4 answers · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has been completed then it will pass through the copy desk and editing to undergo spelling/grammar revision, and a revision to meet the norms of the APA; The median time to review a revised version of a paper is a little over 2 months. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. This change has occurred I submitted my manuscript to a journal. This change has occurred I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Admin Dashboard （管理者ダッシュボード）に表示される査読プロセス中の論文ステータスは以下の通りです。 I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. 2. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and expertise). Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. On November 9th, the second revision was sent back to a reviewer, and it is still "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" until now. 2022 Awaiting final decision 17. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Recommendation can also be "get reviewer to clarify" so it goes back to the review cycle. A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. 4 awaiting reviewer score 22. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. 7 Awaiting Reviewer Scores Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | TKing: Author: Struggling123. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2019-11-15 16:38:26 12. Typically, these are the statuses, respectively, for when the paper is in peer review (‘Awaiting reviewer scores’) and after (‘Revision’). In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. Humanities Anyone have insight as to why this might have happened? If it matters, this draft has already been through a revise & resubmit. 5 resubmitted 11. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? 您在查找awaiting reviewer scores拒稿概率吗？抖音综合搜索帮你找到更多相关视频、图文、直播内容，支持在线观看。 major revision如果最后没有被录，一般就是修改态度不认真。 (4)审稿人给小修，基本上可以出去吃顿大餐了。不过直接给小修的概率很低。因为 Otherwise, it will be changed to "awaiting reviewer scores. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. 7 answers I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. " Does this My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. For most journals, when we submit revised manuscript, the status automatically updates to 'awaiting reviewer scores' since revised files are mostly sent back to reviewers to ensure that With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling In general, in the context of the process of publishing in scientific journals, the phrase “wait for the results of the review after review” refers to the period it takes for the research to Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Possible decisions are Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, and Reject. Revisions of papers with a "Major revision" decision should be resubmitted within at most three months. 2022 Major revision 15. 1. 15 answers. ’ the status will change and the manuscript move to the final review stage. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? Thank you. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. 30 TE verifies reviewer comments Reviewer comments: Reviewers BCD agree to accept. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". In case of a rejection decision, note that the AE can only make the initial decision and communicate this to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). 2. 5 Submit Revision 2023. Now it is almost 3 weeks. 20 Major Revision 12. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. 19 Awaiting EIC Decision 12. Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 12. Create your own webinar 2023-7-31 major revision 2023-8-12 revision submitted 2023-8-14 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-8-31 awaiting final decision 2023-9-4 accept This journal requires no more than 15 figures and tables. 编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。 7. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. orgot F . Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants. Your. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". co. Awaiting reviewer scores: January 6, 2021 Accepted: February 7, 2021 Major Revision (21-Dec-2020), Awaiting Reviewer Scores (6-Jan-2021)I will continue to update after acceptance. My paper has received the review score required in the first week of July, and is awaiting the editor's recommendation for more than a month now. Review Successful Grants. Explore. The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". However, it's been around 40 days that the status has not changed and I After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Now for the last rejected without going through the peer review process if the Editor decides that they are not suitable for the journal. Anyway, as yours was a minor revision, you probably don’t have much the reason for my question is to understand what are the circumstances that make the editor change the status from completed to assigned. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Under review. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. 14 submitted 9. 25 Rejected First review: 4 reviewers, minor revision, two major revisions, one rejection, editor gave rejection. The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for Dec 5, 2017 · I have I have a paper that was under review with one of Wiley's journals. 10 awaiting EIC decision; and review. Still the status is same. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. I for example look at my assignments once a week. They likely have requested another review. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? What • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. In most cases, if a paper is returned after a relatively minor revision, and I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. or further revision I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. My manuscript went from "awaiting recommendation" back to "awaiting referee scores. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. The status of the paper changed several times. 09 awaiting Co-EIC recommendation; 2023. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. 28 major revision 11. I didnt see the "under review 论文小修后await. What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather straightforward"? 0. 10. Write the revision comments carefully. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. First of all, do the review ahead of schedule, as soon as you can, and before the arbitrary 6 week deadline. You would want to do this if some reviews are not due yet and you need the additional reviews to make a recommendation. Major revision on February 7, 2022. Sometimes, the editor, after going through the reviews, might feel that an additional review is required. 25 Changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation Currently, I have sent two emails to the AE and journal administrator but have not received a reply. 7. What does this mean? Please help. In that case, will it be communicated directly to us (by the managing editor) or even request for revisions/clarifications will also Peer Review in Progress. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I have submitted a paper to IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting on September 12th and after about 4 months the status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting AE Decision". TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under Aug 7, 2017 · We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 9. , if one of the original reviewers was generally happy with EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. It is the EiC After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. " Does that mean the reports were split and the paper is going out to another reviewer? 4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod ! Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. Asked 4th Aug, 2021; However, the status of my revised manuscript is showing "awaiting reviewer scores" again. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. 14 Awaiting AE recommendation 01. In my second round (major revision), after "Awaiting AE Recommendation", then goes back to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)", what does it mean? Hard to tell, but I'm guessing it means waiting for reviewer scores. The Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have 12. The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. What is the decision process for a typical paper? Nearly all papers fall into one of three categories: i) Rejected without review (as described above), ii) Rejected after review, and iii) a Major Revision followed by a Minor Revision followed by Accept. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". If you can, be on hand to talk through the piece of homework. It has been three weeks since. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. 08. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. This change has occurred 2023. The editorial office reserves the right to send any papers to journal Editorial Board members where they believe a paper’s quality might not meet the journal’s threshold for publication. I don't understand what this means. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". 08 Awaiting reviewer scores 10. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. 07. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Hi. Again, the two statuses occurring together is surprising. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". The AE is the most responsible AE I have ever encountered. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. After that, it became "awaiting EIC decision" along with another "awaiting reviewer scores," which has been going on for about a week now. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. 19 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. 2022 Awaiting reviewer scores 19. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. 29 Awaiting TE Recommendation 12. There are two bullet points that have remained unchanged for about 8 weeks now - one saying 'awaiting reviewer scores' and the other saying 'awaiting recommendation'. So, if you mean these are the statuses after What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the reviewers comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the editorial office. How long I should wait for the final verdict? One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. This change has occurred After the status 'Awaiting reviewer scores,' the status changed to 'Revision,' and the status is still active. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 12. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. If the paper was sent back for revision, the Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review, awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision How much should I help, awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. 11 Accepted The changes in the submission status can be referred to by everyone. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). 2022 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 18. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. 3. Submitted on March 22, 2022. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. It started with "awaiting reviewer scores" for about a month, then changed to "awaiting AE recommendation" for about 25 days. Resubmitted on February 28, 2022. Review guidelines. Awaiting recommendations: waiting for an editor to make a recommendation Recommendation can be "get another review" so it goes back to the review cycle. Under review after revision April 28th: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment May 11th: Under review May 14th What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. or does the editor might assign new reviewers to evaluate CONTENTS Logging Into Your Editor or EIC Center. No matter which decision you receive, be sure to read the entire decision letter carefully. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. First status was awaiting reviewer score then awaiting AE recommendation decision and today again showing status awaiting As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. However, I definitely remember the last two: After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". 2022 In peer review process 23. Role of the reviewer Your reviewers will read your paper or case study and teaching note and provide the journal editor with detailed and useful comments. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Password 17. I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. 09. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. Awaiting Reviewer Scores. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. « After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " TUM 2022-09-26 Let me share my progress with everyone, hoping that we can all actively share information. Thanks! Here’s a process and then a format that I recommend in this case. The status also means that the paper has been sent to the minimal number of peer reviewers required by the journal (it being 2-3 for most journals). 5. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. 25 Awaiting EIC decision 01. If it is low, then it Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. Asked 4th Aug, 2021 What is the meaning of "Awaiting Referee Scores" after revision ? Question. blogspot. This can happen, e. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. e Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. Reviewer A still has one question regarding the actual robot experiment. . Once the requisite number of After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. In the first notification, I got a major revision. Awaiting review scores on January 9, 2022. Meaning of status changing between Awaiting Technical Editor Scores and Awaiting AE Recommendation (AE) is awaiting the peer reviewer’s comments and evaluation of the paper. A direct change after submission (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and decided not to send it for review. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 To request major revision and encourage resubmission; To reject the paper outright; The referees provide supporting remarks and their comments are generally very helpful for improving the quality of submitted papers. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. 2022 accept Overall, the review process is moderately paced. Does that mean one of the reviewer reject the paper after major revision or he excused that he couldn't revise it and if that yes how can the reviewing completed then. If your manuscript is at this stage, then enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate it and we just need to wait for the reviewers to return their comments so that a decision can be taken. Sixth review on In these cases we’d request that you accept the review, and be appropriately critical, per below. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting EA (Associated Editor) decision. 06. 10 Awaiting reviewer scores 11. 29 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 11. This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting reviewer assignment," and now "awaiting reviewer invitation. However, I just noticed that the status of my The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers and guide the paper through several revision stages. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. 5. If accepted, the paper is sent to production. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. Role of the referee. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. 21 Awaiting reviewer assignment 10. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. uk has a great post or two about why review can take I submitted a paper to some journal. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. January 10, 2023 - Accepted after revision January 23, 2023 - Resubmitted February 5, 2023 - Accepted I hope everyone can successfully publish their papers. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. This change has occurred After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. Some reviewers will ask for a longer period of time; if the request is reasonable, please grant it. So, please give me In contrast, if in this journal the peer-review typically takes several months, then it might be long desk-rejection. Submitted on December 25, 2021. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" 文章投到International journal of damage mechanics一个多月了，一直是Awaiting Reviewer Scores状态，是啥意思啊？跟以前投稿期刊的状态说明都不一样啊，还望投过的学友给予指导~谢谢！ Decisions are based not only on the content of the written reports, but also taking into consideration the quality assessment scores returned by each reviewer. 28 Changed back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023. The paper received an R&R last summer and a revised version was provided. I'm aware of the typical workflow of a journal. The status changed from “awaiting reviewer scores” to “awaiting AE recommendation”. 16 awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision, 22. 0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision 5. What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. It is indeed not rare to get desk rejection after several weeks. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. Revisions of papers with a "Minor revision" should be resubmitted with a month. And it changed to “awaiting reviewer scores” on the 17th, which was same as (the experience of) the one on the 69th floor. I have submitted a manuscript to a ScholarOne journal. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. When asked to review a paper, typically referees are asked to comment on the following aspects of it: Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Also, keep in mind rejection rate without review in your journal. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. 15 Awaiting Reviewer scores 01. Fifth review on 23rd January, accepted after minor revision. 2022-10-29 Submit 2023-01-04 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023-02-07 Reject The first review took 3 months, so please be cautious and selective in submitting for graduation. 19 Awaiting AEIC recommendation 01. Ok, so you’ve agreed to review the paper. The final decision on what to publish rests with the Editor of the journal. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. " Does this “awaiting reviewer score”. Awaiting reviewer selection. Find Funding. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". Asked 4 August 2021; Mohd Shariq; (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. 2022 revision submitted 19. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. 17 Accepted asdfg12123 2022-02-04 What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. 编辑很快做出决定。若未经审稿人评审（letter或correspondence除外），稿件几乎都会被拒绝。 6. How long do I need to wait to get the result? Thanks! I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Hi, I submitted my revised paper in a journal after making major revision. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. Couldn't find the status change in between. What could be the reason for this situation? What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. 2022-3-30 Returned for Revision 2022-4-4 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022-4-11 Awaiting ED Recommendation 2022-4-12 Awaiting AEIC Recommendation 2022-4-25 Awaiting EIC Decision 2022-4-29 Awaiting Final Processing by Me 2022-4-29 Accepted cquptyang 2022-04-05 How long after acceptance do I need to pay the layout fee? After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed If a manuscript is awaiting revision, you will be able to extend the due date using the “Due on:” box and clicking “Save. I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under Sep 7, 2021 · In your case, it is possible that the revised manuscript was taken up by an editor/associate Received after three months of revision, the reviewer was particularly responsible and their suggestions were very helpful in improving the paper. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. avjsv ythxllzb hyhunio ofrqrl vppdds rta gdjbjrg fteird jowt kgwtmmy